A load break switch (LBS) is a medium-voltage switch that sits functionally between a disconnector and a circuit breaker. It can close onto and break rated load current, normal load current, and specified overload current, but it cannot interrupt short-circuit current (short-circuit protection is normally provided by a series fuse or an upstream breaker).
In simple terms: a disconnector can only be operated with no load, and a circuit breaker can interrupt fault current but at high cost. The load break switch fills the gap — it switches under load frequently, at a fraction of a breaker's price.

The core challenge is how to safely extinguish the arc formed when contacts separate under load. No matter how fast the contacts open, drawing an arc is unavoidable during load switching. The arc-extinguishing capability therefore defines the switch's performance limit.
Common arc-extinguishing methods:
| Criterion | Type | Feature |
|---|---|---|
| Installation | Indoor / Outdoor | Outdoor needs stronger sealing and anti-pollution design |
| Interrupting medium | Air / Vacuum / SF₆ / Eco gas (e.g. g3) / Solid insulation | Determines breaking capacity, life, and environmental profile |
| Poles | 3-pole / Single-pole | 3-pole for three-phase systems |
| Operating mechanism | Manual spring / Motor spring / Magnetic | Determines convenience and automation level |
The three-position (closed—open—earthed) integrated design is now standard: grounding switch integrated in the same tank as the load switch, with mechanical interlocking that fundamentally prevents "earthing while energized" — essential for compact RMUs.
| Function | Disconnector | Load Break Switch | Circuit Breaker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Break rated load current | ✘ (no-load only) | ✔ | ✔ |
| Break short-circuit current | ✘ | ✘ (via fuse) | ✔ |
| Frequent operation | Not suitable | Suitable | Possible but costly |
| Visible disconnection (for maintenance) | ✔ | ✔ (visible earthing) | Generally not |
| Cost | Low | Medium | High |
In short: wherever load switching is needed but short-circuit breaking is not, a load break switch is the right tool.
Beyond rated voltage, current, and frequency, pay attention to:
Although an LBS cannot break short-circuit current, combined with a fuse it forms an economical fault-protection unit: the load switch handles normal load switching, while the fuse melts within milliseconds on short circuit and trips the three-pole switch via a striker, preventing single-phasing. This classic scheme is widely used in RMUs, cable branch cabinets, and transformer protection.
SF₆ offers near-perfect insulation and interruption, but it is among the most potent greenhouse gases — GWP ~23,500× CO₂ and an atmospheric lifetime of 3,200 years. Regulation is tightening fast:
Route 1: Eco gas (g3-type) — seamless performance, but still fluorinated g3 is a mixture of fluoronitrile (C4-FN) and CO₂, delivering interruption and insulation performance fully equivalent to SF₆ with identical footprint and ratings — a true drop-in replacement. However, it contains fluorine and falls under PFAS-class substances, facing both EU regulatory scrutiny and supply-chain uncertainty.
Route 2: Fluorine-free (vacuum + air / nitrogen / CO₂) — the current mainstream A vacuum interrupter handles breaking, while air, nitrogen, or CO₂ is used purely for insulation. These natural gases have GWP close to zero and contain no PFAS at all. The technology is mature at MV level with footprints comparable to SF₆ equipment, making it the first choice for new projects — especially in the EU.
| Aspect | g3 (fluoronitrile mix) | Vacuum + Air/N₂ | Vacuum + CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaking method | Gas arc quenching | Vacuum | Vacuum |
| Insulating medium | Fluoronitrile + CO₂ | Air / Nitrogen | CO₂ |
| GWP | ~400 (<1% of SF₆) | ≈0 | 1 |
| Contains fluorine (PFAS) | Yes | No | No |
| Performance vs SF₆ | Identical, same footprint | Mature at MV; slightly larger tanks at HV | Needs larger tanks or higher pressure |
| Supply chain | 3M ceased; relies on alternative sources | No dependency | No dependency |
| Regulatory outlook | Affected by EU PFAS restrictions | Most robust | Robust |
Selection advice: For EU-bound projects or hard carbon-footprint mandates, prefer the fluorine-free air/nitrogen route; for retrofitting existing SF₆ sites where footprint and operating habits must stay unchanged, the g3 route works best. Rockwill supplies both — so customers are never locked into a single policy outcome.
Contact us:
Edited From:Dyson