2.3 Experimental Verification
Unlike computational simulation, experimental verification directly assesses reactor performance. After selecting a reactor type/specification, prototype/sample tests first run in labs to check basic performance and reliability ⁵. Then, rigorous on - site tests follow — in actual 500kV substations, reactors face complex conditions, the ultimate test of performance/reliability.
The strength of experimental verification is direct observation of real - world performance. Analyzing real - condition data ensures reactors meet design/operation needs. But it has downsides: multiple experiments and long - term data collection drive up costs and time.
3 Application Case Analysis
3.1 Case Background
This case features a 500kV substation in a western city center, powering nearby commercial zones and residential areas. The region has a subtropical climate (15°C annual average temperature, 60% relative humidity), high power demand, a complex grid, and peak loads hitting 400MW.
3.2 Application Process
3.2.1 Selection and Installation
Selection is key to project success, so the stage gets heavy time/resource investment. The team does in - depth demand analysis, evaluating grid load traits, current/voltage needs, and special conditions (e.g., short circuits, overloads).
Based on this, they run calculations and simulations. Using software like PSS/E, they model reactor performance under diverse scenarios (short - circuit current limiting, system resonance, current imbalance). Simulations show a high - reactance, oil - immersed, actively controlled reactor suits best. A small neutral - point reactor (rated current 2000A, reactance 10Ω) of this type is tentatively chosen. To confirm, the team references domestic/international standards (e.g., IEC), local power standards, and prior research in similar cases.
After getting approval from all stakeholders (power companies, design institutes, equipment suppliers), installation starts. A professional team handles physical installation, electrical connections, and system integration. Post - installation, strict on - site tests/commissioning check reactance accuracy, system response speed, and coordination with other power equipment for stable operation.
3.2.2 Operation and Monitoring
Once the equipment is put into operation, an advanced monitoring system is used for real - time data tracking and performance evaluation. It includes not only the monitoring of current and voltage but also the monitoring of equipment temperature, oil quality, and other key parameters.
3.2.3 Maintenance and Optimization
Due to the selection of oil - immersed type and active control, the maintenance of the equipment is relatively simple. Maintenance is only required once a year, mainly including oil quality inspection and calibration of electrical parameters. Based on the operation data, necessary system optimizations are also carried out to further improve the performance and reliability of the equipment.
3.3 Benefit Analysis
3.3.1 Economic Benefits
Cost savings: Owing to careful selection and optimization, the reactor demonstrates a high degree of stability and reliability during operation, greatly reducing the maintenance and replacement costs caused by equipment failures. According to statistics, compared with traditional reactors, the maintenance cost saved within one year is about 20%.
Efficiency improvement: The application of the reactor significantly improves the operation efficiency of the power grid. According to preliminary data, the overall efficiency of the system has increased by about 5%, which means higher power output and lower operation costs.
Return on investment: Considering the equipment cost, operation cost, and efficiency improvement comprehensively, the investment return period of this reactor is expected to be within three years, which is a quite satisfactory result.
3.3.2 Technical Benefits
System stability: The application of the reactor significantly improves the stability of the system. In case of short circuits or other abnormal situations, the reactor can effectively limit the current and protect the power grid and equipment from damage.
Reliability: Due to the selection of the high - reactance, oil - immersed, and actively controlled reactor, the equipment demonstrates extremely high reliability under various working conditions. No failures or abnormalities occurred within one year, greatly improving the reliability of the power grid.
Flexibility and adaptability: The active control system enables the reactor to quickly respond to changes in the power grid, such as load fluctuations and voltage changes, which increases the flexibility and adaptability of the system.
4 Conclusion
This research comprehensively explores the selection, application, and benefits of small neutral - point reactors in 500kV substations. It shows that proper reactor selection is crucial for grid stability and operational efficiency. This principle applies to substations of other voltage levels and types too.
Compared with previous studies, this research emphasizes practical application and benefit analysis, providing more evidence from real - world data and cases. It enriches the theoretical research system of small neutral - point reactors and offers practical support for power system design and optimization.