• Product
  • Suppliers
  • Manufacturers
  • Solutions
  • Free tools
  • Knowledges
  • Experts
  • Communities
Search


Structural Design and Application of Controllable Reactors for Smart Grids

Dyson
Field: Electrical Standards
China

Reactors are key for reactive power compensation in power systems, with magnetically controlled reactors as a research focus. A smart grid, upgrading the traditional one via advanced tech, boosts safety and reliability, raising demands for controllable reactors. Thus, developing new - type ones matters. This paper, combining practice, explores their structural design and application to drive innovation and enhance smart grid construction.

1 Functions and Application Status of Controllable Reactors
1.1 Functions

For grids, controllable reactors cut network losses, lift power factor above 0.9, reduce oscillations, expand damping limits, boost transmission capacity, and enhance voltage stability. For users, they: ① Stabilize voltage, protect equipment like transformers, and extend service life. ② Eliminate harmonics, cut losses, and improve safety. ③ Curb voltage flicker, enhancing power quality. ④ Lower reactive losses for heavy - demand users, slashing electricity costs. ⑤ Enable capacity expansion at low cost via dynamic compensation.

1.2 Application Status

Controllable reactors are widely applied in power systems, such as in power utilities, industrial utilities, new energy power generation and other fields. With the increase in power demand and the upgrade of power transmission and distribution grids, the market demand for controllable reactors is also on the rise.

Reactors fall into three types: magnetic control, switch - throwing, and electronic - switch control. Magnetic control reactors offer continuous adjustment, large capacity, and low cost but have slow response, high loss vibration, and harmonics. Switch - throwing ones avoid vibration/harmonics but adjust discontinuously, limiting use. Electronic - switch types enable continuous adjustment with fast response but suffer from harmonics and high cost. Magnetic control reactors are preferred. To fit smart grids, material/structural upgrades and new designs are needed.

2 Structural Design of Controllable Reactors in Smart Grids

The smart grid, or Grid 2.0, builds on two - way communication networks. It uses new equipment, tech, and methods to boost grid safety, efficiency, environmental - friendliness, and economy, better meeting users’ power quality needs. Controllable reactors are key to smart grid construction. Below is their structural design based on nanocomposite magnetic materials.

2.1 Selection of Magnetic Materials

Nanocomposite magnetic materials consist of nanocrystalline hard and soft magnetic phases. Their grains interact, generating a coupled exchange effect under current. Microscopically, at phase interfaces, magnetic moments reorient fields during interaction, increasing remanence. In controllable reactors: DC applied to windings creates an excitation field, magnetizing the material; AC forms an attenuating field, demagnetizing it.

Prepared via melt rapid quenching, the material undergoes tempering to adjust its microstructure. This enlarges grains and reduces coercivity, meeting adjustment needs.

2.2 Overall Structural Design

The controllable reactor’s structure comprises tie rods, an iron core, clamps, working windings, control windings, and nanocomposite magnetic materials. The excitation column, made of magnetic materials and silicon steel sheets, sits at the center. Working windings flank it, with their outermost layers as main magnetic circuits. The control winding wraps around the magnetic materials.

Principle: During normal grid operation (no harmonic suppression/reactive regulation needed), the reactor detects voltage, current, and reactive power. These data go to the control system for grid status evaluation. For harmonic suppression or reactive regulation, the control system adjusts winding current. Magnetic materials change reactance via magnetization. Once parameters meet design specs, winding current is adjusted again to demagnetize the materials back to zero remanence.

Per the design circuit, ignoring primary - and secondary - side leakage fluxes, we get:

Where: E1 represents the induced electromotive force of W1; E2 represents the induced electromotive force of W2; E3 represents the induced electromotive force of W3. Further, by using a T - type circuit to equate the two - port network of the controllable reactor, we can obtain:

 

Let Ik = β Ig, and the inductance value of the working port is:

The reactance control coefficient is α, and Ik = αIg. The relationship between the reactance of the working port and α is:

By connecting the working port in parallel with the power grid and treating U1 as a constant, the following system of equations can be obtained:

Where: Ig and Ik denote the effective values of the currents at the two ports; Uk represents the effective value of the voltage at the control port. Solving the system of equations in Formula (5) allows us to obtain the operating performance indicators of the controllable reactor.

2.3 Control System Design

The control system comprises a main circuit (adjusting magnetic material remanence) and a detection-control subsystem (monitoring electrical parameters), working together to achieve management goals. When grid operation requires reactance adjustment, the main circuit applies currents to magnetize/demagnetize materials, while the subsystem monitors loads to keep parameters optimal, ensuring grid stability. Reactance changes stem from core magnetic state shifts. Controllable rectification enables millisecond-level AC output, meeting rapid magnetic state conversion needs. The system issues commands for the reactor to suppress harmonics and regulate reactive power, maintaining grid stability.

Operation process: 1) Detect grid status, collect parameters, and assess stability. 2) When voltage fluctuations/harmonics occur, the reactor's control system issues commands. 3) The main circuit outputs adjustable inductance; materials magnetize, altering remanence/core state and thus reactor inductance. 4) Post-adjustment, reverse-adjust inductance to demagnetize materials and reset the reactor. Matlab simulations verified system accuracy: 15 A magnetizing current and 220 V demagnetizing voltage with stable waveforms, meeting magnetization/demagnetization requirements.

3 Experimental Analysis of Reactance Adjustment Effect

To verify the reactor's reactance adjustment performance, a prototype and supporting control system were built per design and simulations. Experiments analyzed inductance distribution characteristics and evaluated grid power quality changes.

3.1 Stability of the Controllable Reactor

In the experiment, data were collected to plot the volt - ampere characteristic curve and operating current curve of the controllable reactor. The results show that: ① As the voltage value increases, the current of the working winding rises, and the two show a linear relationship, indicating that under different magnetizing voltages, the inductance value stays within a relatively constant range. ② When the magnetizing voltage is 0–35 V, the inductance decreases from 0.74 H to 0.61 H, and the inductance output is stable, meeting the requirement for smooth adjustment. The change of inductance with the magnetizing voltage is shown in Table 2.

In this study, the change in the inductance value of the controllable reactor is achieved through the magnetization and demagnetization of magnetic materials, which in turn depends on the alternating current and direct current passed into the control winding. This operation will also bring disturbances to the working winding. Therefore, it is necessary to further analyze its working transient process. To this end, a mixed-domain oscilloscope was used to collect the current waveforms of the magnetic materials during magnetization and demagnetization. The results show that the reactor responds quickly, and the current waveform is in a stable state after magnetization is completed.

3.2 Measured Results of Inductance Value

During the actual operation of the controllable reactor, the inductance values obtained by applying different magnetizing voltages are shown in Table 3. The analysis reveals that: ① The inductance value of the reactor changes approximately linearly with the variation of the remanence of the magnetic material. This means that even a slight change in the DC voltage can effectively adjust the inductance value of the reactor. ② By precisely regulating the magnetic state of the magnetic material, the controllable reactor can flexibly change its inductance value, thereby achieving effective compensation of the reactive power in the power line.

3.3 Changes in Power Grid Power Quality

In the power system, the current and voltage changes on the high - voltage side of the transformer before and after using the controllable reactor were recorded, and the harmonic characteristics were observed. The results are shown in Table 4. The analysis shows that: ① Before using the controllable reactor, the current and voltage changes on the high - voltage side were complex, and their waveforms had no regular features; after using the controllable reactor, the current and voltage waveforms on the high - voltage side were improved and had obvious regular features. ② After using the controllable reactor, the harmonic content decreased, the active power increased, and the power quality was significantly improved.

4 Conclusion

In conclusion, reactors play a crucial role in power systems, stabilizing voltage, suppressing harmonics, damping oscillations, and boosting power factor. Among existing types, magnetically controlled reactors, with continuous reactance adjustment, large capacity, and low cost, are widely used in power systems. To address issues like slow response and high loss vibration of magnetically controlled reactors, this study designs a controllable reactor using nanocomposite magnetic materials.

Experimental conclusions: ① The reactor responds rapidly, with stable current waveforms after magnetization. ② Even small DC voltage changes can effectively adjust inductance. By precisely regulating the magnetic state of materials, the reactor flexibly changes inductance to compensate reactive power in power lines. ③ After application, high - voltage side current/voltage waveforms and power quality improve significantly, suitable for smart grid promotion. In the future, with new materials, technologies, and processes, controllable reactors will be optimized to better meet smart grid needs and ensure stable grid operation.

Give a tip and encourage the author!
Recommended
Key Technologies of Low-Voltage DC Solid-State Circuit Breakers
1 Technical Challenges1.1Stability of Device ParallelingIn practical applications, the current-carrying capacity of a single power electronic device is relatively limited. To meet high-current requirements, multiple devices are often connected in parallel. However, parameter variations between devices—such as slight differences in on-resistance and threshold voltage—can cause uneven current distribution during parallel operation. During switching transients, parasitic inductance and capacitance
Dyson
09/02/2025
Bridge-Type Fault Current Limiter | Superconducting & Solid-State
1 Bridge-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter1.1 Structure and Operating Principle of the Bridge-Type SFCLFigure 1 shows the single-phase circuit diagram of the bridge-type SFCL, which consists of four diodes D₁ to D₄, a DC bias voltage source V_b, and a superconducting coil L. A circuit breaker CB is connected in series with the limiter to interrupt the fault current after it has been limited. The bias source V_b provides a bias current i_b to the superconducting coil L. The voltage of V_
Dyson
08/25/2025
What should be paid attention to in the design of low-voltage pole-mounted circuit breakers?
Low-voltage pole-mounted circuit breakers are critical protective and control devices in power systems, whose design and operation directly affect system safety and reliability. Their design must comprehensively address environmental adaptability, electrical parameter coordination, and actuator selection to ensure stable operation under diverse conditions. During operation, strict adherence to safety protocols, regular maintenance, and proper handling of exceptional situations are essential to p
Dyson
08/21/2025
Steep-Front Impulse Breakdown of HTV-Coated Composite Porcelain Insulators: Mechanisms, Testing, and Simulation
Porcelain and glass insulators exhibit excellent insulation performance and mechanical strength, but are prone to pollution flashover under severe contamination, threatening the stable operation of power grids. To enhance the pollution flashover resistance of external insulation, manufacturers commonly apply room-temperature vulcanized silicone rubber (RTV) coatings with superior hydrophobicity and hydrophobicity transfer properties onto insulator surfaces, thereby reducing flashover risks. Init
Dyson
08/20/2025
Seed Inquiry
Download
Get the IEE Business Application
Use the IEE-Business app to find equipment, obtain solutions, connect with experts, and participate in industry collaboration anytime, anywhere—fully supporting the development of your power projects and business.