Search


Dry-Type vs Oil-Filled 35kV New Energy Transformers: Cost and Performance Comparison

Compare dry-type, mineral oil-filled, and vegetable oil-filled 35kV new energy transformers in terms of material cost, energy efficiency, safety, and total lifecycle performance. Includes detailed analysis of a 3150kVA, Class 3 transformer.

Ron
Field: Modeling and Simulation
10Year<
Cameroon
Add us on Google

For users, when purchasing a 35kV new energy transformer, choosing between dry-type, mineral oil-filled, or vegetable oil-filled types involves multiple considerations. These include user habits, maintenance-free performance, safety and fire resistance, volume and weight, among others. However, cost differences are undoubtedly one of the most crucial factors.

To illustrate the issue intuitively, this paper selects a three-level energy efficiency dual-winding new energy transformer with a rated capacity of 3150kVA and a rated voltage of 37kV as an example for quantitative calculation and qualitative analysis.

Basic Parameters of the Product

  • Rated Capacity: 3150 / 3150kVA

  • Voltage Ratio: 37&plusmn;2&times;2.5%/0.8kV

  • Connection Group: Dyn1

  • Short-Circuit Impedance: 7%

  • Energy Efficiency Class: Class 3

Differences in Material Costs

Based on the same basic technical parameters and energy efficiency class mentioned above, and combined with current market prices of raw materials (copper at 80,000 yuan/ton), the differences in tax-included material costs of 3150 kVA / 37kV dual-winding new energy transformers&mdash;for dry-type, mineral oil-filled, and vegetable oil-filled types&mdash;are calculated as follows.

It should be specially noted that for dry-type and oil-immersed transformers with the same capacity, voltage class, and energy efficiency class, their respective limits for no-load loss and load loss are different.

Dry-Type vs Oil-Filled 35kV New Energy Transformers: Cost and Performance Comparison

Cost Comparison Conclusion:For the 3150 kVA / 37 kV dual-winding new energy transformer, under the same level 3 energy efficiency, the dry-type transformer has the highest cost&mdash;about 45% higher than the mineral oil-filled transformer. In contrast, the vegetable oil-filled transformer offers better cost - effectiveness, with a cost only about 7.5% higher than that of the mineral oil-filled transformer.

Comprehensive Performance Comparison

To help users reasonably select the product type of 35kV - class new energy transformers based on the budgets and technical requirements of actual engineering projects, the qualitative comparison conclusions are presented in the following table.

Dry-Type vs Oil-Filled 35kV New Energy Transformers: Cost and Performance Comparison

That is, dry-type transformers have significant advantages in terms of floor space, maintenance-free property, safety and fire resistance, short-circuit withstand capability, etc., while oil-immersed transformers have obvious advantages in aspects such as actual operation energy consumption, one-time purchase cost, and whole-life-cycle operation cost.

Give a tip and encourage the author!

Comments

Share your question or perspective
WhatsApp
Send inquiry
+86
Click to upload file
Download
Get the IEE Business Application
Use the IEE-Business app to find equipment, obtain solutions, connect with experts, and participate in industry collaboration anytime, anywhere—fully supporting the development of your power projects and business.
Login
or continue with
New here?
Register