Overseas industrial parks, islands, and commercial and industrial users increasingly demand energy that is "self-generated, self-consumed, low-carbon, and reliable." Traditional AC microgrids suffer from multi-stage AC/DC conversion losses, complex grid-connected/islanded switching, and difficulties integrating multiple energy sources (PV, storage, charging, hydrogen). DC microgrids, which use a common DC bus to unify diverse energy carriers, have become the mainstream technical route for zero-carbon parks.

| Pain Point | Manifestation | Physical Root Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-stage conversion | PV: DC→AC→DC (to storage); loads: AC→DC again | Each AC/DC conversion incurs 1%–3% loss (typical for SiC inverters); cumulative 2%–6% over multiple stages |
| Grid-connected/islanded switching | Requires downtime or prolonged synchronization | AC grid-tie needs frequency, phase, and amplitude triple synchronization |
| Difficult multi-energy integration | PV, storage, charging, hydrogen each as independent systems | No unified DC bus; heterogeneous interfaces and protocols |
| Island reliability | Single point of failure may cause total blackout | No redundant routing or fast isolation |
| Aspect | Traditional AC Microgrid (Physical Principle) | SST DC Microgrid (Physical Principle) |
|---|---|---|
| PV integration | DC→AC inversion, single conversion loss 1%–3% | PV directly connected to DC bus, zero conversion |
| Storage integration | DC→AC→DC bidirectional conversion, cumulative losses | Storage directly connected to DC bus, bidirectional and efficient |
| Load supply | AC→DC multi-stage conversion | DC loads (charging, hydrogen, etc.) directly connected nearby |
| Grid/island switching | Requires triple synchronization; switching risks interruption | DC networking inherently isolated; smooth power-controlled switching (<20 ms) |
Physical root cause: The DC bus enables PV, storage, charging, and hydrogen to couple directly in DC, avoiding multiple AC/DC conversions—this is the fundamental physical basis for overall microgrid efficiency improvement and the first-principle differentiator of this solution over traditional approaches.
This solution features the SST solid-state transformer as the core and a 10+1-port DC router as the backbone, building a "PV-Storage-Charging-Hydrogen direct-flexible" commercial complex DC microgrid: PV, storage, charging, hydrogen, and building loads flexibly access a unified DC bus, with only one AC conversion at the grid interface. Overall plant efficiency reaches 94.5%–97.5% (3–5 percentage points higher than AC solutions), with grid/island switching <20 ms.
Benchmark project: Amsterdam, Netherlands — "PV-Storage-Charging-Hydrogen direct-flexible" commercial complex demonstration project (one of Europe's first, 10+1-port DC networking).

| Value Dimension | Quantitative Metric | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Port capacity | 10+1 ports | Flexible access for multiple sources and loads; plug-and-play scalability |
| Efficiency | 94.5%–97.5% overall (+3–5 p.p.) | Source-load direct connection eliminates multi-stage conversion |
| Switching | Grid/island switching <20 ms | No transient impact in both island and grid-connected modes |
| Redundancy | N+X online redundancy; availability ≥99.9% | Dual-controller hot standby + IGBT auto-bypass |
| Power quality | THD <1%, power accuracy ±1% | No additional filtering equipment needed |
SST DC Router (10+1 ports) Port Planning:
Source ports: PV input (DC), storage (DC), grid connection (AC — the sole AC interface)
Load ports: Charging piles (DC), hydrogen production (DC), building loads (DC/AC optional)
Routing core: SST DC router with full-port power controllability
Management layer: EMS (Energy Management System) + microgrid controller for unified scheduling and black-start management
| Layer | Components | Power Flow | Design Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source ports | PV + Storage + Grid | Multiple sources → bus | Multi-energy complementarity; peak shaving and valley filling |
| Load ports | Charging + Hydrogen + Building | Bus → loads | Nearby supply reduces line losses |
| Routing core | SST DC router | Full-port controllable | Flexible scheduling; port-level fault isolation |
Inherent isolation via DC networking: The SST router implements smooth mode switching through cascaded control of power outer loop and voltage inner loop, with switching time <20 ms (within one cycle), no transient impact, and no downtime. In island mode, the storage provides bus voltage support; in grid-connected mode, the grid interface maintains power balance. This capability is the core reliability enabler for overseas island and park applications.

SST DC Router Core Parameters (10+1 ports, series configurations):
| Parameter | Value | Physical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| DC bus voltage | DC 750 V (optional DC 375 / DC 1500 V) | Matches PV/storage/charging direct-connection voltage levels |
| System capacity | Project-configured; storage standard E4Matrix series (e.g., 4816 kWh / 2400 kW @10 kV) | Covers PV-storage-charging-hydrogen loads and grid/island support |
| Number of ports | 10+1 ports (10 source/load ports + 1 grid port) | Flexible access for multiple sources and loads |
| Overall efficiency | 94.5%–97.5% (+3–5 p.p. vs. AC solutions) | Quantified benefit from eliminating 2–4 conversion stages |
| Single-module isolation / Total isolation | 35 kV / 42 kV | Safety margin for medium-voltage direct connection (type-test verified) |
| Redundancy architecture | N+X intelligent online redundancy; dual power supplies + dual-controller hot standby | Faulty IGBT auto-bypass; availability ≥99.9% |
| THD / Power accuracy | <1% / ±1% | No additional filtering or metering correction needed |
| Volumetric power density | 0.66 kW/dm³ (+130%) | Hybrid three-level topology + SiC devices |
| Grid/island switching | <20 ms | Smooth transient-free transition |
Physical principle: PV, storage, charging, and hydrogen are directly DC-coupled through the SST router's multiple ports, eliminating multiple conversions.
Quantified benefit: Source-load direct connection eliminates 2–4 conversion stages; overall efficiency 94.5%–97.5%, 3–5 p.p. higher than AC solutions; THD <1%, no additional filtering required.
Physical principle: Inherent DC bus isolation, plus power-voltage cascaded control, enables transient-free switching.
Quantified benefit: Switching time <20 ms (within one cycle); reliable in both island and grid-connected modes; no downtime or power interruption during transitions.
Physical principle: PV, storage, charging, and hydrogen are unified on a single DC bus with modular ports.
Quantified benefit: Simplified system and easy expansion—new sources/loads connect plug-and-play; capacity scales modularly; single-port faults are rapidly bypassed via N+X redundancy, ensuring availability ≥99.9%.

| Cost Item | Traditional AC Microgrid | SST DC Microgrid | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conversion losses | Multi-stage cumulative 2%–6% | Only one grid-interface conversion (1%–3%) | Overall efficiency +3–5 p.p. |
| Equipment investment | Distributed inverters, filters, transformers | Integrated DC router; eliminates separate inverters/filtering | Lower initial investment |
| Footprint | Multiple equipment rooms + filtering/cooling space | Volumetric power density 0.66 kW/dm³; reduced footprint | Lower civil construction costs |
| O&M | Distributed equipment, more spares, broader inspection scope | Centralized monitoring + full-lifecycle remote O&M | Lower O&M costs |
Note: Loss figures are based on "single AC/DC conversion 1%–3% (typical for SiC inverters); traditional multi-stage cumulative 2%–6%." Detailed economics should be calculated based on project scale, local electricity tariffs, and construction costs.
| Project | Key Data | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Amsterdam, Netherlands (overseas microgrid) | 10+1-port PV-storage-charging-hydrogen direct-flexible commercial complex (one of Europe's first demonstrators) | Overseas DC microgrid benchmark; specific capacity/bus voltage per project contract |
| Kunshan, China (CNPC reference) | SST ultra-fast hybrid charging station: efficiency 95%+, footprint –40% | SST charging-scenario engineering validation |
| Chongqing Shuitu, China (GDS reference) | 10 kV direct-connected storage: overall efficiency 90%, SOC balancing 99% | Medium-voltage direct-connected storage engineering validation |
Evidence chain note: "One of Europe's first" is based on public-case references; bidding stage can provide project commissioning date, system capacity, and third-party test reports for substantiation.

| Standard | Content | Version Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| IEC 61850 | Microgrid communication & protection information modeling | Ed.2.1 |
| GB/T 34120 | Technical specification for energy storage system grid connection | 2023 edition |
| IEC 60947-2 Annex P | Fast isolation logic for DC solid-state protection | Latest edition |
| EU | CE certification system (applicable LVD/EMC/RED categories) | Certificate list provided per project |
N+X intelligent online redundancy: dual power supplies + dual-controller hot standby; faulty IGBT auto-bypass; single-port faults do not propagate; system availability ≥99.9%.
DC arcs have no natural zero-crossing and are persistent—the solution deploys three defense lines: ① Fast solid-state isolation logic per IEC 60947-2 Annex P (arc clearing time <25 μs); ② DC-side insulation online monitoring (real-time insulation resistance/leakage current alarms); ③ Port-level fault isolation and fast arc extinction to prevent single-point fault propagation. Overseas project delivery includes a safety design description and protection setting scheme.
Modular DC router: Factory prefabricated, complete-unit shipment, and rapid on-site installation;
Overseas localized delivery: Supports destination-country standard adaptation and local certification assistance;
Full-lifecycle remote O&M: EMS cloud monitoring + OTA upgrades + fault self-diagnosis + SOH online assessment.