
Ⅰ. Príosáin Fhuinnimh agus Níos mó Riachtanais Athchóirithe i bPáirceanna Tionsclaíocha Aontaithe
- Costas Mór Leictreachais
- Ilchreidmheachas suntasach idir is lú agus is airde (mar shampla, is airde: ¥1.2/kWh vs. is lú: ¥0.3/kWh), leis an gcuid is airde ag cuntas ar thuarastal níos mó ná 40% den chostas iomlán.
- Cumas transforméara insbháilte, in éineacht le costas íosradh an-réasúnta (os cionn ¥500,000 gach uile ugrade).
- Teorainneacha Spás agus Eochairshóthar
- Léarscáil comhghruaim nach bhfuil aon spás fágtha do stóráil fuinnimh, ag déanamh go mbeadh córais stórála traidisiúnta neamhfeidhmiúil.
- Eochairshóthar aontaithe le hinefficiúntacht agus gan monatóireacht réalaí, ag díol 20%-30% níos mó fuinnimh ná áitrisí forleathan.
- Stádas Solúbtha Leictreachais Ghearr
- Dorchadas neocheanaíochta a dhéanann sástú scuab, ag brath milliúnra milliúnra milliúnra; cumas stórála dearmadach.
- Dúshlán Carbón agus Tiomantóirí Beartais
- Breise orthu ar fhuinnimh traidisiúnta a spreagann costas cán carbón (mar shampla, radharc bliantúil >1,500 tonna a chur i geallúint milliúnra pearsanta).
- Maoirseachta rialtais (mar shampla, ¥0.5/kWh don stóráil fuinnimh) a spreagann ugrades.
II. IESS Core Solutions
- Córas Stórála Fuinnimh Modúil: An Bhua ar Theorainneacha Spás
- Tearmaíocht an-ramhar: ≤90cm-leathan modúil (mar shampla, SigenStack) a mheascadh i ngaps na ndéantais / eochairshóthar idirbhriste gan modúil bunúsach.
- Scuab réasúnta: Cúl amháin <300kg; dalc de dhá duine a oibriú le cúrsaí struchtúrtha plánta aontaithe.
- Cumas stórála: Ó 100kW/200kWh go 10MW+ (a chur ar Li-ion, flow batteries, etc.).
- PV-Storage-Charging Comhtháite: Dlíomhaíocht Fuinnimh Dhinimiciúil
|
Component
|
Solution
|
Benefits
|
|
PV Generation
|
Painéal mono-crystalline (≥22% efficiúntacht) ar roif / carports; tuairisciú forbartha AI; cosaint in aghaidh athrú a chur isteach chun pionós grid a sheachaint.
|
Tuarascáil bliantúil: 2.4M kWh (2MW system), a chur ar 30% de thoradh láithreán.
|
|
Smart Storage
|
Valley-charging & peak-discharging (price arbitrage); demand management to flatten load curves (30% peak-load reduction on transformers).
|
30% higher ROI per cycle; payback period <4 years.
|
|
Charging Piles
|
7-240kW full coverage; time-of-use pricing + sequential charging (prevents transformer overload).
|
60% lower charging cost for forklifts; 40% reduction for employee vehicles.
|
3.Multi-Timescale Energy Storage Configuration
|
Storage Type
|
Response Time
|
Application Scenario
|
Aging Plant Case
|
|
Supercapacitors
|
<1 second
|
Voltage sag support; elevator regenerative absorption.
|
Ensures uninterrupted precision instrument production.
|
|
Li-ion Storage
|
Minutes
|
Daily peak shaving (2-4h discharge).
|
Replaces diesel generators for 2h emergency backup.
|
|
LH₂/Compressed Air
|
Hours+
|
Weekly/monthly regulation; winter heating.
|
Repurposes abandoned pipelines for energy storage (Xiaoshan case).
|
III. AI-Driven Smart Management Platform
- Real-time monitoring: Integrates PV, storage, and charging pile data for dynamic "source-grid-load-storage" visualization.
- AI-powered scheduling: Prioritizes green energy consumption; automatically dispatches storage/grid power during shortages; adjusts non-urgent production lines/charging pile load.
- Carbon management: Auto-generates emission reports aligned with industry standards; supports carbon credit trading.
- Smart O&M: Proactive fault alerts (>95% accuracy); automated work orders; 50% higher maintenance efficiency.
IV. Retrofitting Implementation Roadmap
- Spatial Assessment & Design
- Use BIM scans to identify idle space (e.g., gaps ≥90cm can deploy 1MWh systems).
- Phased Deployment
- Phase 1: Modular storage + smart charging piles (commissioned in 3 months for basic peak-shaving).
- Phase 2: Expand rooftop PV + long-duration storage (e.g., retrofit abandoned hydrogen tanks for LH₂ storage).
- Policy & Funding Coordination
- Secure local subsidies and green loans.
V. Benefit Analysis
|
Metric
|
Pre-retrofit
|
Post-retrofit
|
Improvement
|
|
Annual Electricity Cost
|
¥24 million
|
¥19 million
|
↓20.8%
|
|
Transformer Expansion Need
|
30% capacity increase
|
Zero new capacity
|
Saves ¥3 million
|
|
Power Supply Reliability
|
20 hours downtime/yr
|
<2 hours downtime/yr
|
↑90%
|
|
Carbon Reduction
|
1,500 tons/yr
|
Certified Zero-Carbon Park
|
Provincial Green Factory Award
|
VI. Case Study: Mannheim Energy Hub Transformation
Pain Point: An 8-hectare retired coal plant site with dense underground pipelines; zero available land for new large-scale storage.
Solution:
- Maximized existing infrastructure: Integrated original grid access points to deploy 50MW/100MWh LFP storage (zero new land use).
- Space-optimized embedding: 30 ISO-standardized containerized units retrofitted into abandoned plant structures.
Benefits:
- Scalability & Capacity: Annual peak-shaving = 200% of local peak load; 100MWh storage powers critical industries >2 hours.
- Environmental & Economic Returns:
- Annual CO₂ reduction: 7,500 tons (equivalent to 3M liters of fuel saved or 85+ hectares reforested).
- Annual revenue >€1.5M via electricity arbitrage & grid frequency regulation services.