Busbar current carrying capacity calculator

Shape *

Width/Diameter *

Thickness *

Conductor *

Current type *

Bus bars in parallel *

Ambient temperature *

Excess-temperature over a room *

Ventilation *

Position *

Surface state *

Current calculation formulas

I = 24.9 * S^0.5 * p^0.39 * [θ^0.61 / √(1 + α(θ + 25)ρ)] * [1 / √(Rac/Rdc)] * [1 / √(1 - 0.015(θ + 25)/10)]

Definitions

I = Current carrying capacity of busbar (A)
S = Wire size (cm²)
p = Perimeter (cm)
θ = Overheating (°C) above the ambient temperature of 45°C
α = Temperature coeff. (°C⁻¹)
ρ = Resistivity at 20°C (Ω cm)
Rac/Rdc = Coefficient of the skin effect. Ratio between the resistance in alternating current and in direct current

Description

Calculate the maximum continuous current-carrying capacity of busbars based on material, size, environment, and installation conditions.

Supports:

Copper / Aluminum materials
Rectangular / Round busbars
Ambient temperature and temperature rise
Ventilation (open air, enclosed, forced)
Installation position (horizontal, vertical, stacked)
Surface finish (unpainted, dark painted)
Parallel busbars

Key Formula

I = K × √(A × ΔT) × f₁ × f₂ × f₃

Where:
K: Material factor (Cu≈1.0, Al≈0.6)
A: Cross-sectional area (mm²)
ΔT: Allowable temperature rise (°C)
f₁: Ventilation factor
f₂: Position factor
f₃: Surface factor

Example

Copper rectangular busbar, 100×10mm, ambient 35°C, ΔT=30°C, open air, horizontal, unpainted
→ Current capacity ≈ 2800 A

Give a tip and encourage the author!

Frequently asked questions

What does the busbar current‑carrying capacity calculator compute and which busbar types and conditions are supported?

This tool calculates maximum continuous current‑carrying capacity for busbars. It supports copper and aluminum, rectangular and round busbars.

Parameters include ambient temperature, allowable temperature rise, ventilation mode, mounting orientation, surface finish and parallel busbars for LV‑HV switchgear design verification.

What is the difference in ampacity between copper and aluminum busbars, and what does material factor K represent?

Copper busbars deliver much higher ampacity than aluminum with identical cross‑section and conditions.

Material factor K reflects inherent conductive and thermal properties, K≈1.0 for copper and K≈0.6 for aluminum.

Larger cross‑section is required for aluminum busbars to achieve comparable current capacity.

Why do ventilation and installation arrangements reduce busbar allowable current capacity?

Open‑air installation provides best heat dissipation. Enclosed compartments limit cooling while forced ventilation improves it.

Horizontal, vertical and stacked arrangements change heat dissipation paths.

Poor cooling causes higher temperature rise, derating factors must be applied to reduce permissible ampacity.