
1. Prinsipyong Struktura ug mga Advantages sa Efisiensiya
1.1 mga Diferensya sa Struktura nga Nakakaapekto sa Efisiensiya
Ang mga single-phase distribution transformers ug three-phase transformers adunay significant nga mga diferensya sa struktura. Ang mga single-phase transformers kasagaran naggamit og E-type o wound core structure, samtang ang three-phase transformers nagamit og three-phase core o group structure. Kini nga variation sa struktura direkta nakaapekto sa efisiensiya:
- Ang wound core sa single-phase transformers optimizes magnetic flux distribution, nabawasan ang high-order harmonics ug associated losses.
- Nagpakita ang datos nga ang single-phase wound-core transformers adunay 10%–25% mas mababa nga no-load losses ug ~50% mas mababa nga no-load currents kumpara sa traditional three-phase laminated-core transformers, uban sa significantly nabawasang noise levels.
1.2 Working Principle Reducing Losses
- Ang single-phase transformers proseso lamang ang single-phase AC, simplifying design pinaagi sa pag-eliminate sa phase differences ug magnetic potential balancing issues inherent sa three-phase systems.
- Sa three-phase transformers, ang unbalanced loads mogahin og additional losses: rotating magnetic fields sa core joints ug transverse flux leakage sa lamination seams madaghan ang energy dissipation.
- Ang single-phase transformers nakaavoid kini nga mga issues tungod sa independent magnetic paths, enhancing operational efficiency.
1.3 Power Supply Mode Optimizing Line Losses
- Ang single-phase transformers mahimogon ang "small capacity, dense distribution, short radius" power supply model. Pinaagi sa pag-install near load centers, sila mobawas sa low-voltage supply radii, reducing line losses.
- Ang practical applications gamiton ang single-pole suspension mounting, saving material costs ug improving installation efficiency—ideal para sa rural ug urban fringe grid upgrades.
2. Material Usage ug Manufacturing Cost Advantages
2.1 Material Savings Reducing Costs
- Ang single-phase transformers nagamit og 20% less core material ug 10% less copper kumpara sa equivalent-capacity three-phase units.
- Kini mogahin og manufacturing costs sa 20%–30%.
2.2 Case Study: Rural Grid Renovation
- Sa Shexian County, humanud sa pag-adopt sa single-phase transformers:
- Low-voltage line construction costs decreased by ~20%.
- Substation area construction costs fell by ~66%.
- Bisan na ang initial investment slightly higher (e.g., ¥5,000 for 50kVA single-phase vs. ¥4,500 for three-phase), ang Life Cycle Cost (LCC) over 10 years significantly lower: ¥22,585 (single-phase) vs. ¥57,623 (three-phase).
2.3 Cost-Effective Power Supply Modes
- Ang single-phase systems nagamit og two-wire high-voltage lines (10% savings) ug two- or three-wire low-voltage lines (15% savings), reducing engineering costs.
- Ideal para sa rural grids uban long lines ug dispersed loads.
2.4 Production Advantages
- Ang simpler structure enables mass production, facilitating adoption of advanced technologies like amorphous alloy cores, further cutting costs.
3. Applicability Analysis in Different Scenarios
Application Scenario
|
Key Features
|
Case Details
|
Transformation Effect
|
Advantages
|
Rural Power Grids
|
Long supply radii, high line losses, poor voltage quality
|
Shexian County: 30kVA three-phase transformer replaced with two single-phase units (50kVA + 20kVA)
|
Line loss ↓ from 12% to 2.2%; voltage compliance ↑ from 97.61% to 99.9972%
|
Solves "low-voltage" issues, improves reliability
|
Urban Residential Areas
|
Concentrated loads, voltage drops at peak times
|
Ankang Dongxiangzi: 250kVA three-phase replaced with six 50kVA single-phase units
|
Line loss ↓ from 5.3% to 2.2%; end-point voltage stabilized
|
Shortens supply radius, enhances voltage quality
|
Street Lighting Systems
|
Energy-saving potential via voltage adjustment
|
Single-phase V/V₀ transformers reduce voltage to 200V at night, saving 16% for 70W high-pressure sodium lamps
|
Lower line losses, smart control for efficiency
|
Energy savings via intelligent control
|
4. Recommendations for Rational Application
4.1 Capacity Selection
- Core Principle: "Small capacity, dense distribution":
- Rural areas: ≤20kVA; urban areas: ≤100kVA.
- Wiring:
- ≤40kVA: 1 circuit; ≥50kVA: 2 circuits; prioritize single-phase three-wire system.
- Formula: P=kf⋅Kt⋅∑PN=Kx⋅∑PNP = k_f \cdot K_t \cdot \sum P_N = K_x \cdot \sum P_NP=kf⋅Kt⋅∑PN=Kx⋅∑PN (where kfk_fkf: load factor; KtK_tKt: simultaneity factor).
4.2 Installation Methods
- Independent: For scattered villages; ensures proximity to loads.
- Branch-Type: For flexible power switching.
- Mainline-Type: For three-phase areas with no three-phase loads.
- Prioritize single-pole mounting for space-saving and easy maintenance.
4.3 Hybrid Power Supply
- Single-phase loads ≤15% of three-phase loads: direct summation; else, convert to equivalent three-phase loads.
- Load Matching:
- Single-phase: residential loads; three-phase: industrial motors.
- Seasonal fluctuations: Use on-load capacity-adjustable transformers.
4.4 Operation and Maintenance
- Smart Monitoring: Remote data collection and metering.
- Protection Devices:
- High-voltage side: PRWG or HPRW6 drop-out fuses.
- Lightning protection: gapless composite insulator surge arresters.
- Low-voltage side: isolating switches + molded-case circuit breakers for safety.
4.5 Economic Considerations
- LCC Advantage: Lower long-term costs despite higher initial investment (e.g., ¥22,585 vs. ¥57,623 over 10 years).
5. Future Trends and Prospects
- Material Innovations:
- Amorphous alloy and wound cores will further reduce no-load losses by 70%–80% and 10%–15%, respectively.
- Smart Grid Integration:
- IoT-enabled monitoring and AI-driven optimization enhance real-time management.
- Renewable Energy Synergy:
- Facilitate rural distributed PV/wind integration, improving energy absorption.
- Standardization:
- Guidelines like Rural Power Grid Upgrade Technical Principles will refine application norms.